Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DC Reade's avatar

"On the links of cannabis to cancer & genotoxicity by two of its best researchers, Reece & Hulse"

The research of Reece and Hulse is a lot more controversial than your praise implies. From reading their work and researching more about their reputations, they're anti-cannabis jihadists. To read them, one would get the impression that cannabis is some sort of mega-thalidomide that's been loosed on the world; they've stated conclusions to the effect that cannabinoids are one of the principal environmental carcinogens. Just because they publish a lot of work does not mean that their research is authoritative. They rely on bundling studies selected for their negative conclusions about cannabis effects, and then subject the aggregate to the sort of regression analytical methods that can torture the data into saying almost anything, particularly when confounders are ignored. This most recent published compilation by them is pretty much of a rehash of earlier published research, as can be verified by perusing earlier issues posted right here on your Substack.

I don't think that cannabis is harmless, particularly high-potency THC products; You've linked studies on negative effects that I find persuasive. But it's nowhere near the public health catastrophe that Reece and Hulse are speculating that it is, and it's dismaying that their alarmism is granted credence anywhere, much less on this site.

It needs to be consider that along with responsible research, the recent explosion in post-legalization era cannabis research appears to included a well-funded effort directed at making cannabis wrong in order to thwart legalization of this non-patentable natural substance. The pharmaceutical industry would prefer to have all cannabinoids corraled under their control as synthetic patented product lines, to dispense or withhold at the behest of their influence and authority.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts